I was skimming through a response to Michael Vlach's position on Israel in Rom 9-11. The responder is an amillennialist. To be fair, I didn't have time to read the full rebuttal - it's located in a book (Three Views on Israel and the Church) which I don't own.
It seemed to me that the author's responses to Vlach relied somewhat on an appeal to typology. In fact my first thought (perhaps unfairly) was, "He's defending his doctrine on Israel via typology."
As Dr. Paul Henebury writes, we can't cast out typology. However, we ought to be careful about using it to prove doctrine. See HERE and note the links to more articles at the end of the answer.
This Sunday at Church: Pray for my child’s baptism would be opportunity for
the Gospel to be considered with the other kids at church
-
This Sunday at Church I want to encourage you to do the following: Pray for
my child’s baptism would be opportunity for the Gospel to be considered
with th...
20 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment