I was skimming through a response to Michael Vlach's position on Israel in Rom 9-11. The responder is an amillennialist. To be fair, I didn't have time to read the full rebuttal - it's located in a book (Three Views on Israel and the Church) which I don't own.
It seemed to me that the author's responses to Vlach relied somewhat on an appeal to typology. In fact my first thought (perhaps unfairly) was, "He's defending his doctrine on Israel via typology."
As Dr. Paul Henebury writes, we can't cast out typology. However, we ought to be careful about using it to prove doctrine. See HERE and note the links to more articles at the end of the answer.
Bible Contradiction? Was Jesus the first to rise from the dead?
-
For today’s post we will tackle the question the Skeptic Annotated Bible
asked: Did the women immediately tell the disciples? Here are the answers
which th...
13 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment