I was skimming through a response to Michael Vlach's position on Israel in Rom 9-11. The responder is an amillennialist. To be fair, I didn't have time to read the full rebuttal - it's located in a book (Three Views on Israel and the Church) which I don't own.
It seemed to me that the author's responses to Vlach relied somewhat on an appeal to typology. In fact my first thought (perhaps unfairly) was, "He's defending his doctrine on Israel via typology."
As Dr. Paul Henebury writes, we can't cast out typology. However, we ought to be careful about using it to prove doctrine. See HERE and note the links to more articles at the end of the answer.
Presuppositional Apologetics Links: Third Week of November 2024
-
These are links concerning Presuppositional apologetics gathered from
November 15th-21st, 2024. 1.) Cave to the Cross’ Virtue Ethics Critique Of
Natural La...
5 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment