Every now and again I see Philip Mauro's name pop up in criticism of dispensationalism, Darby, Scofield etc. I also see him invoked by premillennial non-pretribulationists, simply because of his anti-dispensational stance. But consider that Mauro is one of the heroes of The Preterist Archive. So, why would futurist (premil) non-pretribbers haphazardly cite a preterist just because he wrote against Scofield and "the secret rapture?" That's a rhetorical question, by the way.
Philip Mauro’s “The Gospel of the Kingdom”
Pollock on 'The Patmos Visions"
A Brief Examination of Mr. Philip Mauro's Later Views on Dispensational Truth
Preterism and Prophetic Scripture
Free E-book: Case for Christ by Steve Hays
-
I really appreciate Monergism.com and all the free E-books they have made
available. This one is titled Case for Christ by the late Steve Hays.
Monergism...
19 minutes ago
No comments:
Post a Comment