Every now and again I see Philip Mauro's name pop up in criticism of dispensationalism, Darby, Scofield etc. I also see him invoked by premillennial non-pretribulationists, simply because of his anti-dispensational stance. But consider that Mauro is one of the heroes of The Preterist Archive. So, why would futurist (premil) non-pretribbers haphazardly cite a preterist just because he wrote against Scofield and "the secret rapture?" That's a rhetorical question, by the way.
Philip Mauro’s “The Gospel of the Kingdom”
Pollock on 'The Patmos Visions"
A Brief Examination of Mr. Philip Mauro's Later Views on Dispensational Truth
Preterism and Prophetic Scripture
On Accurately Pinpointing the Phenomena of Daniel 9:24
-
A recent commenter reminded me of this post. It’s worth a rerun. In Daniel
9:24, Gabriel’s words are absolutely essential for a correct interpretation
of t...
5 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment